«An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of Negotiation of Meaning in L2 Vocabulary Acquisition of Chinese Learners of English Baoshu Yi1 & Zhinong ...»
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension and the acquisition of second language word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449-491.
Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1-23.
Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms.
Applied Linguistics, 26, 402-430.
Fuente, M. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary. SSLA, 24, 81-112.
Fuente, M. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 263-295.
Gass, S. M., & Torres, M. J. A. (2005). Attention when? An investigation of the ordering effect of input and interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 1-31.
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S. M.
Gass, & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
www.ccsenet.org/elt English Language Teaching Vol. 6, No. 10; 2013 Hardy, I. M., & Moore, J. L. (2004). Foreign language students’ conversational negotiations in different task environments. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 340-370.
Jeong, Nam-Sook. (2011). Selected proceedings of the 2009 second language research forum. Luke Plonsky and Maren Schierloh (pp. 51-69).
Krashen, S. (1980). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Lee, Byeong-Cheon. (2005). Negotiation of meaning and communication strategies in CMC. Sae Han English Language & Literature, 47(1), 227-259.
Lee, Hyun-Gyung. (2006). Meaning negotiation in task-based video conferencing. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 9(2), 128-153.
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native Language
and Foreign Language Acquisition: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (pp. 259-278). New York:
New York Academy of Sciences.
Long, M. H. (1983). Linguistics and conversational adjustments to nonnative speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4, 177-193.
Long, M. H. (1985). Input and Second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass, & C. Madden (Eds), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowly. MA: Newbury House.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T.
K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Long, M. H. (2011). Instructed SLA (I): Towards a cognitive interactionist theory of instructed adult SLA. In workshop on second language research. Beijing: Beijing Foreign studies University.
Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303-325.
Luan, N. L., & Sappathy, S. M. (2011). L2 vocabulary acquisition: The impact of negotiated interaction. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 5(11), 2.
Pica, T. (1987). Interlanguage adjustments as an outcome of NS-NNS negotiated interaction. Language Learning, 38, 45-73.
Pica, T. (1991). Classroom interaction, participation, and comprehension: Redefining relationships. System, 19, 437-452.
Pica, T. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes, & S.
Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Bristol, PA:
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcome? Language learning, 44, 493-527.
Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1986). Making input comprehensible: Do interactional modifications help? ITL Review of Applied linguistics, 72, 1-25.
Pica, Teresa, Holiday, Lloyd, Lewis, Nora, & Morgenthaler, Laura. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Mackey, A. (2011). Task complexity, uptake of recasts, and second language development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Researching task complexity: Task demands, task-based language learning and performance. John Benjamins.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass, & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.
235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. M. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning.
Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 71-90.
Yong, R. (1983). Negotiation of meaning in children’s foreign language acquisition. ELT Journal, 37(3), 197-206.
Zhao, S. Y., & Bitchener, J. (2007). Incidental focus on form in teacher-learner and learner-learner interactions.
www.ccsenet.org/elt English Language Teaching Vol. 6, No. 10; 2013 System, 35, 431-447.
Appendix Test 1 A pre-vocabulary test for the high school participants School: _____ Class: ______ Name: _____ Sex: ______ Date: ______.
1) Take after____ 2) Anxious _____ 3) Strange_____ 4) Favorite ____ 5) Careful____
6) I won’t be long ____7) Alien ______ 8) Chase______ 9) Picnic_____ 10) Develop___
11) Pull down_____ 12) Set up____ 13) Start _____ 14) Make it clear _____ 15) Drop___
16) Hurt____ 17) Offer____ 18) Shy____ 19) Noise____ 20) Wind___ 21) Worried____
22) Tie____ 23) Ocean ____ 24) Cover___ 25) Used to____ 26) Separate ____
27) Downtown____ 28) Be terrified of _____ 29) Block____ 30) Plenty _____ Test 2 A pre-vocabulary tests for the college participants School: _____ Class: ______ Name: _____ Sex: ______ Date: ______.
1) Bleat ____ 2) Bite ___ 3) Drudge___ 4) Assess___ 5) Sort ___6) Astray ____
7) Astronaut_____ 8) Contraption____ 9) Astonish ___ 10) Assume_____11) Enlarge____
12) Enrage____13) Gorge____ 14) Reiterate____ 15) Superb ____ 16) Drastic______
17) Ability ____ 18) Strike____ 19) Shock____ 20) Culture _____ 21) Interaction____
22) Regularly ____ 23) Appointment _____ 24) Vocabulary ____ 25) Movable_____
26) Capable____ 27) Ritual ____ 28) Enable____ 29) Mobile ____ 30) Contingent ____ Match task 1
Class: Name: Sex: Date: Score:
9. - When will you come back? - I _____________________
10. No one can _______you from me.
Test 4 A post-vocabulary test for the college participants
Class: Name: Sex: Date: Score:
Use the appropriate forms of the following words to fill in the blank:
drudge, contraption, reiterate, contingent, drastic.
1. To pay his debt he had to ______at the work in a coal mine.
2. The police took ______measures to put a stop to the crime wave.
3. That’s a curious________, what is it for?
4. Such risks are _______to the trade.
5. Let me_______ that we have absolutely no plans to increase taxation.
Copyrights Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).