FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Thesis, dissertations, books

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 4 | 5 || 7 |

«The Crusades from the Perspective of Byzantium and the Muslim World edited by Angeliki E. Laiou and Roy Parviz Mottahedeh published by Dumbarton Oaks ...»

-- [ Page 6 ] --

Tia M. Kolbaba [ 137 ] Greek in the city would have let him “reform” a Greek church. If Humbert “reformed” Latin churches in Constantinople, those churches must have been open.92 Second, it is often asserted that Keroularios stirred the common people up to join his conflict with the emperor and Western envoys, and that he found it easy to do so because the people harbored a xenophobic hatred for Westerners.93 A closer look makes this assertion even more questionable than the first. Evidence for popular anti-Latin sentiment in this period is meager. Keroularios did indeed raise the rabble on more than one occasion, but the people’s rage seems to have had other roots: unhappiness with Constantine IX Monomachos, as well as the general malaise of this period of instability in Byzantium.94 In sum, the events of 1054 were insignificant for the short run. They received little attention in the empire at the time. The first known references to a “schism” between Keroularios and Humbert date from the early twelfth century.95 As in the time of Photios, much of the conflict was more individual than general—Humbert versus Keroularios, rather than Rome versus Constantinople. Many of the features of later relations between Byzantium and Latins were not yet evident. Perception of the West as a unity and a threat; anxiety about Latin theological sophistication; popular antipathy—all of these would emerge later.

The Twelfth Century During the Komnenian period (1081–1204), Latin penetration of the empire grew exponentially. This has been discussed too often and too well by other scholars to need elaboration here.96 But this was not the impact of an active, vibrant, potent, masculine Western force on a passive, decadent, impotent, effeminate Eastern despotism. Byzantine emperors and their subjects reacted to Western pressures and exerted their own pressures on Westerners. To read Paul Magdalino’s account of Manuel I’s empire (1143–80) or Ralph-Johannes Lilie’s account of Byzantine relations with the Crusader kingdoms of Syria and Palestine is to see Byzantine emperors both exerting great influence on Westerners and adopting Western ideas and methods.97 The central dichotomy of Alexios I’s (1081–1118) or his grandson’s world was not as much between “Rhomaioi” and “Latinoi” as between “those who are for me” and “those who are against me”; not between “Roman” ways of doing things and “Latin” ones, but between “what works” and “what does not.” The borders were permeable, and both sides were changed by extended contact.

For a fuller statement of this argument, with citations of the primary texts, see Smith, And Taking Bread, 119–21.

Ostrogorsky, History of the Byzantine State, 297; Hussey, Orthodox Church, 134.

´´ ´´ ` ´ Helene Ahrweiler concurs: “Recherches sur la societe byzantine au XIe siecle: Nouvelles hierarchies et ´ nouvelles solidarites,” TM 6 (1976): 121.

A. Michel, Humbert und Kerullarios, Studien, vol. 1 (Paderborn, 1924), 30–33.

Even to survey the bibliography of this topic would be a monumental task. See the bibliography in P.

Magdalino, The Empire of Manuel I Komnenos, 1143–1180 (Cambridge, 1993), or in M. Angold, Church and Society under the Comneni, 1081–1261 (Cambridge, 1995).

Magdalino, Manuel I; R.-J. Lilie, Byzantium and the Crusader States, 1096–1204, trans. J. C. Morris and J. E. Ridings (Oxford, 1993).

[ 138 ] Byzantine Perceptions of Latin Religious “Errors” This two-way flow of men and ideas is a recurring theme in recent histories of the politics, economy, and warfare of the empire. In contrast, the theological sphere in this period is generally portrayed as impermeable. Adopting the view our Byzantine sources would like us to adopt, we tend to see Orthodoxy as a kind of fortress with outer walls of slippery-smooth marble. Latin theological ideas, recognized as novelties and dangerous heresies, bounced off this marble without so much as leaving a smudge. In the end, however, the same sources inadvertently show us a rather different Byzantium, and we cannot quite believe their explicit message of a faith untouched by Western ideas. Perhaps Byzantine theologians remained truly unaffected by Latin ideas in the time of Photios, for at that time their theological and philosophical training was superior to that of anyone in the West. By the twelfth century, however, such superiority was melting away.

The Latins were catching up, and some Greeks knew they were. Given the acrimonious ad hominem attacks of 1054, it is unlikely that Humbert’s logic impressed them. In contrast, when Alexios I listened to debates regarding the procession of the Holy Spirit between a Latin bishop and some Greek theologians (1112), he was convinced by the Latin arguments and sent his own theologians back to the drawing board. The extant account of this debate was written by the Latin bishop, so we should be skeptical. Yet it is true that various Greek theologians worked very hard at refuting Latin arguments around 1112. One senses that their confident condescension had been shaken.98 Still more interesting is the controversy, in the time of Manuel I, over the Gospel phrase, “The Father is greater than I.” The trouble began when an imperial ambassador, Demetrios of Lampe, returning from the Latin West, brought with him ideas about the relations of the persons in the Trinity. He reported that he had heard Latins say that the Son was at the same time inferior to and equal to the Father, and he proclaimed that opinion ridiculous. Emperor Manuel differed with Demetrios and deputed Hugo Eteriano, a Pisan theologian and friend, to argue against him. Probably most of the churchmen of Constantinople supported Demetrios, in part because they believed that his opinion was the traditional, native one, while Hugo’s was a Latin innovation.99 However that may be, the emperor dominated the council that decided the matter in 1166, and so Demetrios’ position was anathematized in the Synodikon of Orthodoxy and Hugo’s inscribed on enormous marble tablets attached to the walls of the Great Church.100 The doctrine that had been criticized by a Greek and defended by a Latin became official dogma within the Greek church.101 Beck, Kirche und theologische Literatur, 616; ODB, s.v. “Grossolano, Peter,” 2:885.

Magdalino, Manuel I, 287–90.

On the tablets, see C. Mango, “The Conciliar Edict of 1166,” DOP 17 (1963): 317–30.

The sources for this controversy have been studied very carefully, and much has been learned from rather scanty material. Still, it may be worthy of another study; ideas about the import of Latin influence in the Komnenian period have changed a great deal since the last careful study of the origins and meaning of this conflict.

My analysis of the events is based on a quick reading of the primary sources and on reflections inspired by Magdalino’s version of the events in P. Magdalino, “The Phenomenon of Manuel I Komnenos,” in Byzantium and the West, c. 850–c. 1200, ed. J. D. Howard-Johnston ( ByzF 13; Amsterdam, 1988); repr. in Tradition and Transformation in Medieval Byzantium (Aldershot, 1991), no. , 196–98. The most thorough article on the controversy, with publication of texts, is P. Classen, “Das Konzil von Konstantinopel und die Lateiner,” BZ 48 (1955): 338–68. See also G. Thetford, “The Christological Councils of 1166 and 1170 in Constantinople,” Tia M. Kolbaba [ 139 ] Although many details of the case elude historians, its broad outlines reveal three important features of Byzantine relations with Latins in the twelfth century. First, the intellectual boundaries between East and West were permeable. Demetrios traveled west and picked up a controversy there. Hugo Eteriano, an Italian, lived in Constantinople and entered the lists as the emperor’s champion. This permeability complicates historical reconstruction of the boundaries between East and West, Greek and Latin, Orthodox and Catholic. Even what initially seems like the simplest question has no answer: Which was the “Latin” position here? At first glance, it seems clear that Hugo’s was the “Latin” opinion. But the answer is probably more complex than that. According to the historian John Kinnamos, Demetrios’ position was imported, for he had “returned from [the West] full of drivel.”102 We cannot unquestioningly believe Kinnamos, however, who was ever-supportive of the emperor and ever-contemptuous of Latins; he omitted any mention of Hugo’s role and presented the emperor’s opinion as wholly self-generated.

In the end, it seems that both sides of the debate were inspired by Western concerns, but that their accounts after the fact were anxious to hide Western influences.103 When we read between the lines, Orthodox Constantinople’s walls look more like a cellular membrane than a marble castle.

Second, Byzantines continued to disagree among themselves about the definition of orthodoxy and specifically about whether that definition included Latins. On the one hand, around this time a list of Latin “errors,” which had probably been circulating for a while, surfaces in the historical record. This, the most scurrilous kind of anti-Latin polemic, reveals the existence of a virulently anti-Latin contingent in Constantinople.104 On the other hand, there is obviously a problem with concentrating too much on the anti-Latin crowd. At least in the controversy surrounding Demetrios of Lampe, they seem to have lost. Hugo and Manuel won; it was their position that became the orthodox position. The marble tablets in the Great Church remained there until 1567.105 Besides, that list of Latin errors was written to convince fellow Byzantines, not to convince Latins.

In other words, the list reveals the existence of Byzantines who were not convinced that Latins were filthy heretics, as well as the existence of those who were.

Third, it was necessary for each side to downplay the role of Western influence in these events. Demetrios and his supporters saw and portrayed themselves as diligent polishers of the smooth marble walls of Orthodoxy, trying to rebuff all things Latin, while

–  –  –

Kinnamos did not mention Hugo Eteriano’s role and portrayed Demetrios’ heresy as an imported product.

A summary of these mixed messages is difficult. Given that it was desirable for both sides to hide any “Latin” connection in their teaching, it seems that anti-Latin sentiment was strong and getting stronger. Yet the presence of Latins in the empire and frequent embassies of Greeks to the West allowed both friendly and unfriendly interaction, as well as mutual influences that usually went unrecorded in contemporary sources. This was still the empire of the Komnenoi, with their ties of blood and friendship to Latins, and with subjects who had not yet experienced the traumatic events of 1204.

1204–1261 After 1204 the opinion that Latins are Christian brothers was modified, even in the most pro-Latin circles. Everyone took the separation of the churches for granted. The period was characterized by one attempt after another to reunite the churches. It also saw both violent resistance to these efforts and a kind of openness to Western ideas.

Paradoxically, the openness was often a result of the division. Some Byzantine scholars thought they had to learn more about the Latins before they could refute them. In the end, these trends led to a wide spectrum of opinion.

At one end of the spectrum is the most scurrilous kind of polemic against the Latins, which became popular. Lists of Latin “customs” or “errors” circulated widely. These included not only theological issues such as the Filioque and liturgical issues such as azymes, but also disgust at the things Latins ate and the clothes they wore.106 In this way, opponents of church union sought to undermine the advocates of union by associating them with filthy heretics. For example, the anti-unionists could not acknowledge that John Bekkos might have reached a conviction of the orthodoxy of the Filioque by reading patristic texts. He must, rather, be a servant of the pope. One of the most infamous anti-Latin texts, the “Dialogue of Panagiotes with an Azymite,” dates to around the Second Council of Lyons. It begins with a description of the arrival of a papal envoy in Constantinople. He is met by John Bekkos, who wears a miter and a ring, which, the author assures us, are symbols of the pope. The papal envoy is leading a mule with a basket on its back. In the basket is an image of the pope. Both Bekkos and Emperor Michael VIII perform acts of submission in front of this mule. Michael actually leads it by its bridle, an idea familiar to Western medievalists and an allusion to Michael’s earlier, hypocritical submission to Patriarch Arsenios.107 An even more striking example of this sort of condemnation-by-association is the case of Patriarch Gregory II of Cyprus. In spite of being the person who finally defeated Bekkos, in spite of his sophisticated elucidation of the Greek doctrine of the procession of the Holy Spirit, he ran into trouble.

His enemies accused him of heresy in that very elucidation, and more than one of them ` ´ See, e.g., Darrouzes, “Memoire,” para. 30, 63, 65, 66, 75.

D. J. Geanakoplos, Interaction of the ‘Sibling’ Byzantine and Western Cultures in the Middle Ages and Italian Renaissance, 330–1600 (New Haven, Conn., 1976), 158. Greek text ed. A. Vasiliev, Anecdota graeco-byzantina (Moscow, 1893), 179.

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 4 | 5 || 7 |

Similar works:

«MOTHERS Broad! Summer 2014 { TABLE OF POETRY New Orleans August 1949, Naima Woods. 4 Scent of Brown Sugar and Fig, Sandra Fees. 5 Gestation, Laura Jent. 6 House of Brown Wicker, Kristen Rouisse. 7 Penelope and Telemachus, 2012, Amy Neill Bebergal. 11 My Therapist Asks About My Mother and I Cannot Answer, Lori Zimmermann. 12 Mothering My Son's Dead Brother, Chanel Brenner. 27 Dying Young, Alexis Rhone Fancher. 28 Ripening, Megan Mealor. 29 Another Round, Please, Julie Howd. 30 Picking...»

«on iti ns p a r ri d T d m a hnical roje ort stG Rep ct bu o T4R a IC Ro Tec FFG P 52 for 8402 # IZED TRAL EMS CEN YS T Y DE OL S IVEL NTR ASS CO on TO M GRID i ers onds IZED rgief ft, V Ene lic und kun RAL maT der Zu b Kli Pu s s „IK ENT ln de Mitte rogramm hrt. s MC e au gefü sP wurd men de durch ekt F RO j ah g“ s Pro im R ibun Diese ert und Ausschre rd 1. gefö All you need is the plan, the roadmap, and the courage to press on to your destination. Earl Nightingale — 1921-1989,...»

«Ravensbury Calico Printing Works, Mitcham These works were situated in the present Ravensbury Park about 470 yards upstream from where Merton Road crosses the Wandle. They were not on the main river, but on the banks of an artificial side stream that still meanders round the edge of the park, and which at this end divided into two roughly parallel channels. The site was approximately opposite the end of the present Ravensbury Grove. The earliest record found which indicates that cloth bleaching...»

«DPI Holding GmbH Leopoldauer Straße 179, 1210 Wien ISMS Information Security Management System Version 01.00 Distribution: Name Department/Company Location kb-endlos Vöcklabruck printcom Vienna Copyright © DPI Holding 2013 Date: January 2013 Author: Projektteam ABER, GENG, JROH Verified by: ATB ISMS Version 01.00 ISMS Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Management Responsibility 1.1 Validity of the Document 1.2 Purpose 2 Strategy 3 Rules and Standards According to the IT Baseline...»

«Come To Where I M From Learn the something that their surroundings's surprise household call or repay the discount resume how your section is headache prices. Also, from you have not ranging Come to Where I'm from an insider service repair, need long you give what your software balance data and avoid on you recent. You will download state data to your Come to Where I'm from surprising cash and vary vowels a newsletter lot fails a maintenance loft. The independent kinds include group into this...»

«AIN’T GONNA LET NOBODY TURN ME AROUND: JOAN BAEZ RAISES HER VOICE Liz Thomson The Sixties: Take Thirteen Open University, 8 December 2000 Revised December 2003 Ain’t Gonna Let Nobody Turn Me Around: Joan Baez raises her voice Shortly after Saigon fell on 30 August 1975 and the last American helicopter had lifted unceremoniously off the roof of the US Embassy, 100,000 people filled the Sheep Meadow in New York’s Central Park for a ‘War is Over’ rally. Pete Seeger, Odetta and Joan Baez...»

«Computers in Human Behavior 15 (1999) 123±142 Cooperating with life-like interface agents S. Parise a,*, S. Kiesler b, L. Sproull a, K. Waters c a IS Department, Boston University, 595 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA b Department of Social and Decision Sciences and Human Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA c Cambridge Research Laboratory, Digital Equipment Corporation, 1 Kendall Square Bldg. 700, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Abstract As...»

«COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Payment Options under Retirement Plans by Allan P. Blostin Bureau of Labor Statistics Originally Posted: April 28, 2003 Under both defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans, employees are given the option of various payment methods at retirement. Various payment options may be offered to an individual under the two basic types of retirement plansdefined benefit plans and defined contribution plans. According to data...»

«Angiogenesis Panel 1 (human) Calibrator Blend, Chemokine Panel 1 (human) Calibrator Blend, Cytokine Panel 1 (human) Calibrator Blend, Human Vascular Injury I Calibrator Blend, Proinflammatory Panel 1 (human) Calibrator Blend and Vascular Injury Panel 2 (human) Calibrator Blend Safety Data Sheet According To Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Rules And Regulations Revision Date: 12Jan2016 SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION 1.1. Product Identifier Product Form: Mixture Product...»

«Att doc_4.2.2 MEDIA REPORT Report September 18-October 15, 2015.SECTION 1: OUTLINE OF NEWS MEDIA COVERAGE Article: Every Month is Library 1. Deep Cove Crier October 2015 Pg. 2 Month Blog Mention: Gallery Surf 2. The Georgia Straight October 2, 2015 Pg. 4 Blog Post: Honouring the Pledges at 3. Reconciliation October 5, 2015 Pg. 5 Canada the North Vancouver District Public Library Photo: Library Month in the District 4. North Shore News October 8, 2015 Pg. 6 Photo and Article: Parkgate Library 5....»

«Application Report SPRA074A – November 2002 Analyzing Target System Energy Consumption in Code Composer Studio™ IDE Software Development Systems ABSTRACT In the world of portable electronics, one of the key care-abouts for consumers is the time they can operate their devices on battery. A top priority therefore in the portable electronics industry is to develop “low-power” solutions. To enable our customers, the portable electronic device providers, to succeed in this endeavor, TI has...»

«Reference: Kaufman, S.B. (2006-2007). Review of Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough by Patricia D. Stokes. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 26, 273-278. I recently began a workout program to lose some fat and restore the six pack abdomens I never had. One of the main tenets of the program is variability in the type of workout I do. Apparently, muscles bore easily. If you do the same workout day in and day out, eventually improvements will be hard to come by. If...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dis.xlibx.info - Thesis, dissertations, books

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.