FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Thesis, dissertations, books

Pages:     | 1 || 3 | 4 |   ...   | 83 |

«You are free to share, copy, distribute and transmit the electronic version of this work, in whole or in part, under the following conditions: • ...»

-- [ Page 2 ] --

Our book puts power back in centre stage. Notice the metaphoric equality in the title: ‘Capital as Power’. We use not and, but as. We do not speak of capital and power; of capital in the service of power, or vice versa; of capital in relation to state; of capital with or against politics; of capital in contradistinction to violence; or of capital and ideology. We refer not to a relation, connection, function, or juxtaposition, but to a figurative identity. Capital does not relate to power. It is, in itself, a mode of power.

The purpose of this book is to explain capital as power. The first step toward understanding our argument, therefore, is to stop thinking of capital and capitalism as ‘economic’ entities. But that is just the start. The second step is to be willing to take on the dogma that makes capital and capitalism ‘economic’ entities in the first place.

How and why Young children are obsessed with the question ‘why?’ ‘Why do I need to brush my teeth?’ ‘Why do birds fly and dogs don’t?’ ‘Why does mommy have to go to work?’ The quest is universal, but it doesn’t last for long. Children quickly learn that grownups dislike the question and often don’t know how to answer it, and they realize that one ‘why?’ inevitably leads to another, followed by further hassle and endless aggravation. So they grow up. By the age of five or six, they abandon the ‘why?’ in favour of the more practical ‘how?’ They stop questioning the world and try to fit into it. They become adults, and they usually remain so for the rest of their lives.

But not everyone grows up. As Mark Twain (1881) reminds us, some people stay young no matter how old they become. And the youngest of all are those who never stop asking ‘why?’ This book is written for these young people of all ages. We write it for those who feel their future is at stake and wish to do something about it; for those who sense that there is something deeply wrong with the conventional creed but don’t know exactly what it is;

and, above all, for those who simply dislike dogma and want to think for themselves.

Perhaps the key problem facing young people today is a lack of theoretical alternatives. A new social reality presupposes and implies a new social cosmology. To change the capitalist world, one first needs to re-conceive it;

and that re-conception means new ways of thinking, new categories and new measurements. And yet, many contemporary critics of capitalism seem to believe that they can challenge this social order without ever asking how it operates, let alone why.

With some obvious exceptions, present-day leftists prefer to avoid ‘the economy’, and many are rather proud about it. To prioritize profit and 4 Why write a book about capital?

accumulation, to theorize corporations and the stock market, to empirically research the gyrations of money and prices are all acts of narrow ‘economism’. To do these things is to fetishize the world, to conceal the cultural nuances of human consciousness, to prevent the critic from seeing the true political underpinnings of social affairs. Best to leave them to the dismal scientists.

And, so, most self-respecting critics of capitalism remain happily ignorant of its ‘economics’, neoclassical as well as Marxist. They know little about the respective histories, questions and challenges of these theories, and they are oblivious to their triumphs, contradictions and failures. This innocence is certainly liberating. It allows critics to produce ‘critical discourse’ littered with cut-and-paste platitudes, ambiguities and often plain nonsense. Seldom do their ‘critiques’ tell us something important about the forces of contemporary capitalism, let alone about how these forces should be researched, understood and challenged.

Most importantly, though, this stale context conditions students to stop asking ‘why?’ The big questions about capital are pushed under the rug, and as the young generation gets older and becomes established, the questions are forgotten altogether. Occasionally, an untamed spirit, having discovered an old debate in an outdated book, raises a naïve ‘why?’ But these spontaneous fires are quickly isolated and extinguished. Ridiculed by know-all professors and hushed by acolyte students, the outlier is forced to relinquish or perish.

There is no alternative, and the safest thing for an academic is to never wonder why.2 Our book defies this dogma. We provide a new conceptual framework for capital – along with the context that this framework negates and the means by which it is articulated. ‘There is no empirical method without speculative concepts and systems’, writes Einstein in the forward to Galileo’s Dialogue 2 As a first-year economics student at Tel-Aviv University, one of us (Nitzan) challenged the professor with questions about the assumptions. Economists make plenty of those, so there were many questions to ask. Initially, the professor was happy to engage. But two weeks into the course, the questions became more difficult to answer, the students grew annoyed with my interventions, and the professor began to apply the usual stalling tactic. ‘Yours is a very interesting question’, she would say, ‘but it’s too early to deal with it. Please raise it later, when we deal with this topic in greater detail’. This method is popular among economics instructors, and it works particularly well when combined with a heavy dose of ‘problemsolving’ exercises. The seemingly ‘practical’ drill forces students to accept the underlying premises, and when the premises are accepted the questions quickly disappear. But I persisted, so the professor had no choice but to shut me off altogether. When I inquired why I was being ignored, her reply was short and informative: ‘You don’t know how to ask questions’.

Many years later, an undergraduate student in one of my political-economy classes summarized the same dilemma from a different angle: ‘Your class makes me sooo nervous.

With all my other professors, I can write pretty much what I want as long as I stick to the syllabus and properly cite the readings. But your class doesn’t work this way. Not only do I have to do my own research, I also need to invent the research question. And in the end, I can still be wrong!’.... What a terrifying thought.

Why write a book about capital? 5 Concerning the Chief Two World Systems (Galilei 1632). But, also, ‘there is no speculative thinking whose concepts do not reveal, on closer investigation, the empirical methods from which they stem’ (p. xvii). The two processes are dialectically intertwined. And, so, together with our theoretical schemes, we introduce new research methods; new categories; new ways of thinking about, relating and presenting data; new estimates and measurements; and, finally, the beginnings of a new, disaggregate accounting that reveals the conflictual dynamics of society. We show that there can be many alternatives, provided we never stop asking why.3 Clearly, we would be happy to convince our readers with our specific arguments, but that goal is secondary. The more important goal is to encourage readers to develop their own research. As the book will amply show, social facts are indispensable but never ‘self-evident’, and since the emperor is so often naked, we shouldn’t be afraid to ask why. There is a lot to suspect in the world of the ‘obvious’, so try to distrust the ‘experts’ and ‘authorities’ – be they mainstream or critical. In the final analysis, the only way to develop your own opinion – instead of adopting the opinions of others – is to always ask why and constantly re-search your own answers.

What’s wrong with capital theory?

Begin with the monetary magnitude of capital. This magnitude is readily observable. We know how much it costs to buy existing capital on the stock and bond markets, just as we know how much it costs to set up a new company, or to put in place new plant and equipment. But what determines these monetary magnitudes? What are the forces that lie beneath the earthly appearance of capital? Why is Microsoft worth $300 billion and not half that much? Why does Toyota pay $2 billion rather than $4 billion for a new car factory? Why do these magnitudes tend to grow over time? What sets their pace of growth?

Economists – both liberal and radical – claim to have answered these questions. Capital, most would say, is an economic category anchored in material reality. In the final analysis, the monetary value of capital derives from and reflects the underlying processes of consumption and production.

Mainstream neoclassical economists view this determination from the output side. Capital for them is made of tangible capital goods (and now also of intangible knowledge or technology). The magnitude of capital in money terms is proportionate to its productivity – namely, to its ability to produce goods and services that satisfy human wants and generate happiness. This transmutation is meaningful because both capital and its productivity are 3 On the clash between modern academia and the scientific endeavour, see our unpublishable manuscript ‘The Scientist and the Church’ (Nitzan and Bichler 2005). The paper can be downloaded for free from http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/185/.

6 Why write a book about capital?

counted in the same universal unit, the elementary particle of economics:

the ‘util’.

Marxists see things rather differently. Capital for them is not a material substance per se, but a social relation embedded in productive, material entities. In order to understand capital, they argue, we have to look behind the hedonic veneer of liberal ideology and examine the industrial essence of the system. From this viewpoint, the key issue is not the utility that the capital produces, but the social process by which capital itself gets produced.

Consequently, the proper way to approach capital is not from the output side, as per the neoclassicists, but from the input side – the side of labour.

Marxists, too, count capital in universal units: the units of ‘abstract labour’. This is the elementary particle of Marx’s cosmology. Quantitatively, the dollar value of capital in the Marxist scheme is proportionate to its cost of production, and, specifically, to the amount of abstract labour socially necessary to produce that capital.4 Unfortunately, both explanations fail. In the end, neither the neoclassicists nor the Marxists are able to answer the question of what determines the magnitude of capital and its rate of accumulation.

Many reasons conspire to produce this failure, but the most important one concerns the basic units of analysis. As we shall see, utils and abstract labour are deeply problematic categories. They cannot be observed directly with our senses, and they cannot be examined indirectly through intermediation. Their ‘quantity’ cannot be calculated, even theoretically. In fact, they are not even logically consistent entities. These shortcomings are very serious, and the last one potentially detrimental.

It is of course true – positivism notwithstanding – that a scientific theory does not require all of its elementary particles to be observable, whether directly or indirectly. To mention the obvious, atoms were deemed unobservable till the early twentieth century, many subatomic particles are still elusive, and entities such as strings will perhaps stay so forever (or at least for a while longer). Yet the ‘invisibility’ of these elementary particles has hardly diminished the scientific footing of modern physics.5 Indeed, one may argue that, since Galileo, the strength of science lies precisely in its ability to explain observed magnitudes by unobserved ones.6 4 This is the view of classical Marxists, but not of neo-Marxists. Although the latter accept many of Marx’s assumptions and analyses, they no longer use abstract labour as a basis for understanding contemporary capitalism and modern accumulation. The difference between the two approaches has significant implications, which we explore in Chapters 4 and 8.

5 On the concept of ‘observation’ and its intricacies, see Shapere (1982).

6 According to Zev Bechler, one of Galileo’s chief contributions to the scientific revolution was the rejection of Aristotle’s anti-informativism in favour of informative theories. In his Two New Sciences, Galileo suggested that, ‘Since I cannot do more at present, I shall attempt to remove, or at least diminish, one improbability by introducing a similar or a greater one, just as sometimes a wonder is diminished by a miracle’ (quoted in Bechler 1991: 131). In other words, modern science advances not by insisting on logically complete and therefore Why write a book about capital? 7 The situation is quite different with neoclassical utils and Marxist abstract labour. These units are unlike atoms, electrons, or strings. The latter may be unobservable to us, but that shortcoming – at least in principle – could be attributed to our own limitations. Theoretically, atoms, electrons and strings are logically consistent entities with a definite set of quantities, whether deterministic or probabilistic. By contrast, utils and abstract labour are invisible not because of our own shortcomings, but because they do not – and cannot – posses a definite magnitude in the first place. They have pseudo-quanta. Even if we could somehow ‘see’ them, there would be nothing to measure. And ‘quanta’ that cannot be measured – no matter how important they might be otherwise – cannot form the basis for quantitative analysis.

The consequence is that neoclassical economics and Marxist political economy lack a basic unit. And without a basic unit, we remain right where we started. We know the price of capital in dollars and cents, but not how many utils or hours of abstract labour this value supposedly represents.

We know that capital accumulates, but not why it accumulates or what this accumulation means.

Toward a new theory of capital The secret to understanding accumulation, this book argues, lies not in the narrow confines of production and consumption, but in the broader processes and institutions of power. Capital, we claim, is neither a material object nor a social relationship embedded in material entities. It is not ‘augmented’ by power. It is, in itself, a symbolic representation of power.

Pages:     | 1 || 3 | 4 |   ...   | 83 |

Similar works:

«Telecomunicaciones Historia Tecnologías Futuro PDF generado usando el kit de herramientas de fuente abierta mwlib. Ver http://code.pediapress.com/ para mayor información. PDF generated at: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:20:06 UTC Contenidos Artículos Telecomunicación 1 Teléfono 10 Telefonía móvil 15 Televisión 25 Radiofrecuencia 38 Satélite de comunicaciones 41 Fibra óptica 45 Referencias Fuentes y contribuyentes del artículo 61 Fuentes de imagen, Licencias y contribuyentes 62 Licencias de...»

«Volume 5, Issue 5, May 2015 ISSN: 2277 128X International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering Research Paper Available online at: www.ijarcsse.com Implementation of Efficient Extraction of Deep Web by Applying Structured Queries and Maintaining Repository Freshness Yogesh Kakde, Manoj Kumar Rawat, Jitendra Dangra LNCT Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India Abstract— Information on web is growing at extremely rapid rate. To retrieve this huge amount of information...»

«MIRROR VS. DIELECTRIC VS. PRISM DIAGONAL COMPARISON By: William Paolini, 3/6/2014 v2 Back Row ( 2 ) Baader Zeiss Prism, Takahashi Aluminum Mirror, Astro-Tech Dielectric, Baader Dielectric, Astro-Physics MaxBright Dielectric Center Row ( 1.25 ) Baader T2 Zeiss Prism, VERNONscope Enhanced Silver Mirror, Takahashi Prism, Tele Vue Everbrite Dielectric Front Row ( 1.25 ) Vixen Prism, Astro-Tech Dielectric, Celestron Prism (vintage 1980s) Figure 1 Diagonals used in this comparison Image by the Author...»


«Ocean Explorers Registration Form Which Ocean Explorers Program are you signing up for?  Ocean Discovery – June 4th  Marine Life, Big and Small – June 11th  Lagoon Trekkers – June 18th  Deep Sea Discovery – June 25th Child’s Information First: Middle: _ Last: _ Gender: Male Female Birth date: _/_/ Age: _ Street Address: Town/City: _ State: Zip code:_ Child’s Home Phone:_ Parent/Guardian Contact Information First: Last:_ Ms. Mrs. Mr. Other: _ Street Address: Town/City:...»

«8. Fachtagung des Ausschusses Umweltmeteorologie der Deutschen Meteorologischen Gesellschaft. 20.3 bis 22.3.2012, Leipzig. 5_V_5, 1-6 RayMan and SkyHelios Model Two Tools for Urban Climatology Andreas Matzarakis Meteorological Institute, Albert-Ludwigs.-University Freiburg, Werthmannstr. 10, D-79085 Freiburg, andreas.matzarakis@meteo.uni-freiburg.de Abstract For urban climatological information and data about climate and climate influencing factors are of importance in order to derive complex...»

«Western Downland C of E Primary School Inspection report Unique reference number 116387 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 379247 Inspection dates 25−26 April 2012 Lead inspector Janet Sinclair This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4−11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 143 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Andrew Donald...»

«Music for Youth Orchestras Selected in conjunction with National Association of Youth Orchestras (UK) Boosey & Hawkes invites youth orchestras to explore the rich and exciting repertoire created by 20th century and contemporary composers. Works have been specially selected and graded for youth orchestra, and information includes helpful suggestions for training and rehearsals. 1 Symphony Orchestra 10 Chamber Orchestra 11 String Orchestra 13 Wind Orchestra Levels of difficulty are from 1-5...»

«Università degli Studi di Cagliari DOTTORATO DI RICERCA Scienze della Terra Ciclo XXIV ZIRCON U-PB AND LU-HF ISOTOPIC DATA FROM SOME PERIGONDWANA VARISCAN TERRANES (SARDINIA-CORSICA BLOCK AND CALABROPELORITAN ARC): NEW INSIGHTS ON THE CENOZOIC GEODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF THE CENTRAL MEDITERRANEAN BASIN Settori scientifici disciplinari di afferenza GEO/03 Presentata da: Dott.ssa Pamela Pavanetto Coordinatore Dottorato: Prof.ssa Rosa Cidu Tutor: Dott. Antonio Funedda Prof. Massimo Matteini Prof....»

«McDonald, Alexa (2015) Assessing the robustness of the Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF) as a measure of premorbid intelligence in Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia and clinical research portfolio. D Clin Psy thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/6793/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing...»

«47 Optical Plumbing versus RTK-GNSS – Staking out on high Levels Wunderlich, Th. Technische Universität München, Faculty of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering, Arcisstrasse 21, 80290 Munich, Germany, Web site: www.geo.bgu.tum.de E-mail: th.wunderlich@tum.de Abstract Staking out high-rise buildings always involves the problem to ensure the absolute verticality, from storey to storey until completion of the top floor. At least from a construction height of 100 meters on, systematic and...»

«Rating Action: Moody's downgrades five Danish banks' senior ratings following reduction of systemic support Global Credit Research 16 Feb 2011 Ratings incorporating systemic support placed on review for further possible downgrade; outlook on three banks' financial strength ratings changed to negative from stable London, 16 February 2011 Moody's Investors Service has taken various rating actions on a number of Danish banks. These actions follow the bankruptcy and transfer of Amagerbanken to a...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dis.xlibx.info - Thesis, dissertations, books

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.