FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Thesis, dissertations, books

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 5 | 6 || 8 | 9 |   ...   | 83 |

«You are free to share, copy, distribute and transmit the electronic version of this work, in whole or in part, under the following conditions: • ...»

-- [ Page 7 ] --

This duality of political equality and economic inequality produces a destructive contradiction. Recall that, according to Marxists, capital accumulates in the economic–productive sphere. This is where class conflict is generated, labour exploited and surplus value expropriated. But the economic process cannot occur independently of politics. Accumulation, because it is based on exploitation, cannot be sustained at the level of the individual producer-employer alone. It requires legal, ideological and cultural institutions; it needs state organs and other power organizations; it has to be framed, shaped and contained from above. In short, it requires the political power of a (nation) state. In this way, the institutions and organizations of power – although unproductive in the direct economic sense – are nonetheless indispensable for maintaining and reproducing the economic order as a whole. At the same time, these very institutions and organizations are nourished by and depend on the surplus extracted in the economic sphere. In this sense, the economic base of exploitation can exist only under a political superstructure of oppression, and vice versa.

But that requirement makes capitalist politics inherently contradictory:

liberal politics has to be equal in ideology and theory, yet unequal in practice.

And since this contradiction is produced by the very nature of capitalism, the only way to resolve it is to overthrow the system altogether. Eliminating the exploitation of workers by capitalists will simultaneously eliminate the duality of politics and economics. (Marxists, of course, express both the contradiction and its resolution dialectically rather than mechanically as we have done here, and certainly with far greater finesse; but their political conclusion is essentially the same.) Capitalism from below, capitalism from above To sum up, then, both neoclassicists and Marxists separate politics from economics, although for different reasons. The neoclassicists see the separation as desirable and, if handled properly, potentially beneficial. By contrast, Marxists view the distinction as contradictory and, in the final analysis, destructive for capitalism. Yet, both conclusions, although very different, are deeply problematic – and for much the same reason.

The difficulty lies less in the explanation of the duality and more in the widespread assumption that such a duality exists in the first place. Even E. P.

Thompson, a brilliant historian who was otherwise critical of Marxist theoretical abstractions, seems unable to escape it. Writing on the development of British capitalism from the viewpoint of industrial workers, he describes the class socialization of workers as ‘subjected to an intensification of two intolerable forms of relationship: those of economic exploitation and of political 30 Dilemmas of political economy oppression’ (1964: 198–99). In this dual world, the industrial labourer works for and is exploited by the factory owner – and when he organizes in opposition, in comes the policeman who breaks his bones, the sheriff who evicts him and the judge who jails him.

Now, this bifurcation is certainly relevant and meaningful – but only up to a point. From the everyday perspective of a worker, an unemployed person, a professional, even a small capitalist, economics and politics indeed seem distinct. As noted, most people tend to think of entities such as ‘factory’, ‘head office’, ‘pay cheque’ and ‘shopping’ differently from the way they think of ‘political party’, ‘taxation’, ‘police’, ‘military spending’ and ‘foreign policy’.

Seen from below, the former belong to economics, the latter to politics.

But that is not at all what capitalism looks like from above. It is not how the capitalist ruling class views capitalism, and it is not the most revealing way to understand the basic concepts and broader processes of capitalism.

When we consider capitalist society as a whole, the separation of politics and economics becomes a pseudofact. Contrary to both neoclassicists and Marxists who see this duality as inherent in capitalism, in our view it is a theoretical impossibility, one that is precluded by the very nature of capitalism. To paraphrase David Bohm (1980), from this broader perspective, the politics–economics duality is not a useful division, but a misleading fragmentation. It cannot be shown to exist – and if it did exist, profit and accumulation would cease and capitalism would disappear.

The consequences of this entanglement for capital theory are dramatic. As we shall demonstrate, without an ‘economy’ clearly demarcated from ‘politics’ we can no longer speak of quantifiable utility and objective labour value;

and with these measures gone, neoclassical and Marxian capital theories lose their basic building blocks. They can observe that Microsoft is worth $300 billion and that Toyota pays $2 billion for a new factory, but they cannot explain why.

Real and nominalThe classical dichotomy

As noted, underneath the broad duality of politics and economics lies the further bifurcation of the economy itself. Following the so-called Classical Dichotomy, first suggested in the eighteenth century by British philosopher David Hume, neoclassicists separate economic life into ‘real’ and ‘nominal’ domains. Of the two, the real sphere is primary, the nominal secondary. The real sphere is where production and consumption take place and relative prices and distribution are determined. The nominal sphere is the domain of money and absolute prices, and it both lubricates and reflects the input– output processes of the real economy.

At the root of this duality lies an attempt to justify capitalist profit and wealth. The liberal claim – first voiced in the European city-states of the thirThe dual worlds 31 teenth and fourteenth centuries and later formalized in John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government (1690) – is that private property emerges from one’s own labour. This claim makes the bourgeoisie unique: earlier dominant classes looted their wealth and therefore needed religion to sanctify it; the capitalists, by contrast, produce their wealth with their effort and hence have a natural right to own it.3 Nominal income and assets, therefore, are derivative not of mercantilist plunder but of actual production with real capital goods, and that makes them fully justified. The productivity of the capitalist, intertwined with his existing capital goods, results in monetary earnings. These earnings in turn are ploughed back into producing more capital goods, leading to more monetary wealth, more capital goods, more earnings, and so on in an everexpanding spiral. In this way, the money value of finance, measured in dollars and cents, reflects and manifests the physical capital stock created by the capitalist.

Of course, the correspondence is far from perfect. As it turns out, the ups and downs of the stock and bond markets are rather difficult to correlate with changes in the capital stock – particularly since, as we shall see in Chapter 10, the two measures tend to move in opposite directions. But this mismatch hasn’t been much of a concern. Liberals have solved it by putting into work an army of ‘distortionists’ – theorists, strategists and analysts who pry on ‘institutional imperfections’ and ‘exogenous shocks’. The theory, argue the distortionists, is perfectly fine. The problem is with the extra-economic forces – the shocks that constantly besiege the otherwise pure economic system, contaminate its real and nominal spheres and fracture their pristine correspondence.

Once you account for these distortions, it becomes clear why finance is always dependent on – yet forever delinked from – its true material essence.

The Marxist mismatch Although the Marxist logic on this subject is radically different, its conclusions are surprisingly similar. Contrary to the liberals, Marx sought to annul the bourgeois justification for profit. He agreed that value is created in the material sphere – but instead of multiple factors of production, he insisted that there is only one: labour. The value of all commodities – including that of capital goods – is determined by productive labour alone.

3 Perhaps the first to explicitly associate income with productivity were the university professors. Knowledge (scientia) was the gift of God and therefore could not be sold, but the new urban intellectuals found a better leverage: the notion that all work deserves a salary. ‘We find it irrational that the worker not profit from his work’, argued the doctors of law in thirteenth-century Padua, and then went on to conclude that ‘the master may accept the money

of students – the collecta – as the price of his work, of his trouble’ (quoted in Le Goff 1993:


32 Dilemmas of political economy In this scheme, not all capitals are created equal. The so-called industrial capitalist, the employer of productive labour, does possess real capital. But the commercial and financial capitalists – insofar they employ only unproductive labour and therefore produce neither value nor surplus value – do not own real capital. Although they accumulate moneyed capital, they do so merely by appropriating some of the surplus value generated by industrial capitalists. The resulting intra-capitalist redistribution creates a mismatch. It means that the nominal magnitude of any particular capital is likely to differ from its underlying real magnitude: for the industrialist the nominal will be lower than the real, while for the commercial and financial capitalist the nominal will exceed the real (which may well be zero).

The nominal–real mismatch is further amplified by the forward-looking nature of financial markets. Stock and bond prices represent the present value of expected future earnings. Because we deal with expectations, these future earnings may or may not be ‘realized’. And since the earnings are merely tentative, there is no reason why finance should be equal to – or even correlate with – capital goods that already exist here and now. For this reason Marx considered financial assets to be ‘fictitious capital’ – in contrast to the ‘real capital’ anchored in the dead labour of realized surplus value.

And, here, too, the Marxists find themselves stuck in a liberal duality.

They portray a world in which the parasitic capitalists of commerce and finance suck in surplus from the productive capitalists of industry, where speculative market bubbles inflate and deflate around the fundamentals of production, where the fiction of finance distorts the true picture of real accumulation. The specific categories and theories differ from those of the liberals, but the real–nominal bifurcation that underlies them is the same.

Quantitative equivalence?

Separating the real from the nominal enables the theorist to play both cards. On the one hand, he can stand by the theory, insisting that in the final analysis nominal finance derives from the reality of capital goods. On the other hand, when the difference between finance and capital goods gets too larger, he can suspend the theory – at least temporarily, until the ‘distortions’ go away.

This convenient doublespeak serves to conceal a deep ontological difficulty. At issue here is the very assumption of quantitative equivalence. Both neoclassicists and Marxists believe that capital has two quantities – one nominal, the other material. And they further believe that, under ideal circumstances – without intervening factors and other extra-economic distortions – these two quantities are equivalent.

As we shall show, this assumption rests on foundations of sand. Its first component – the belief that capital has two quantities – falls flat on its face. Capital certainly has a nominal quantity. We know its price in dollars and cents. But capital does not have – and indeed cannot have – a material The dual worlds 33 quantity. The second belief, namely that the two quantities of capital are equivalent, is also seriously problematic. Even if capital goods did have a material quantity, why should this quantity have anything to do with the nominal value of capital? Capital, this book argues, is not a productive economic entity; it is a broad power institution. And if that is the case, what could the ‘mass’ of machines – even if it had a calculable quantity – tell us about the social dynamics of power?

3 Power Force is nothing apart from its effect.

—Herbert Marcuse, Reason and Revolution The pre-capitalist backdrop To understand the origin and rationale of the capitalist dualities, it is useful to begin with some observations on the pre-capitalist world. As we have seen, prior to the emergence of liberalism all state and quasi-state regimes – or ‘cultures’ in today’s lingo – were marked by a binary structure: an inescapable conflict between mastery and slavery, between rulers and ruled. The material bedrock was agricultural. In economic parlance, there were two ‘factors of production’: land and labour. Politically, these factors corresponded to two classes: the nobility and the peasantry. The nobility owned the land and imposed its rule. The peasantry – save for the occasional revolt – passively submitted to the nobility’s rule.

This early mode of production, to use Marx’s language, unfolded through multiple forms of authoritarianism, despotism and tyranny – from the Carolingian state of Europe and the Caliphates of the Middle East to the Moguls of India and the empires of China and Japan. The histories of these dictatorships varied greatly. Some relied on peasant-slaves, as in the ancient empires; others were based on farmer-tenants, as in the Middle East; and still others were built on serfs tied to princely fiefdoms, as in Europe and Japan.

But the underlying principle was always the same: redistribution through confiscation. The nobles would rob the peasants, each other, or both.1 1 The dominant postmodern fashion loves to reject this universal history (or should we rather say ‘narrative’) – in favour of a much more politically-correct protestation. The postists not only decry the oppression of the ‘East’ by the ‘West’, but also insist that the so-called ‘Western scientific revolution’ in fact originated in the... ‘Orient’ (see for instance, Hobson 2004).

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 5 | 6 || 8 | 9 |   ...   | 83 |

Similar works:

«Sixteenth ARM Science Team Meeting Proceedings, Albuquerque, NM, March 27 31, 2006 Pyrgeometer Calibrations for the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program: Updated Approach T. Stoffel and I. Reda National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado J. Hickey The Eppley Laboratory, Inc. Newport, Rhode Island E. Dutton and J. Michalsky National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Geophysical Monitoring Division SUNY-Albany, New York Introduction Accurate measurements of the broadband...»

«Jon's Mini-codiums and More Taffeta I'm happy to be given the opportunity to offer miniature and dwarf daffodils to interested people. This is my first sales list I joined the American Daffodil Society in 2003 and my main interest are miniatures, species, tazettas, and fall flowering daffodils. Many of the miniatures and dwarf daffodils are illustrated in this listing, the cultivars without photographs, please refer to the American Daffodil Society's Daffseek at http://daffseek.org to view...»

«Parkes Shire Civic Commemoration of ANZAC DAY 25 April 2016 ANZAC DAY PARKES 0530 hours Dawn Service Memorial Hill 0630 hours Breakfast Bistro Services and Citizens Club 0700 hours Church Service Parkes Catholic Church 0730 hours Church Service Parkes Anglican Church 0815 hours March ‘Fall In’ outside of the Services and Citizens Club Marshall Mr Graham Cooke The following bodies in order of March: Disabled Ex-Service Men and National Servicemen Women in Taxis Parkes Guides/Brownies Parkes...»

«Copyright © 2011-2015 by Nobo Komagata (http://nobo.komagata.net/pub/Komagata11-Grandma.html, http://nobo.komagata.net/pub/Komagata11-Grandma.pdf) A Day with My 98-year-old Grandma Nobo Komagata insi2.org First written: September 25, 2011; Last updated: March 13, 2015 In my household, the birthday person does something special on her/his own birthday. In the past, I cooked avocado rolls for my wife and daughter on my birthday. This year, I decided to spend a day at my grandma's bedside. She is...»

«The Architecture of Aftermath: Iconomy and Contemporaneity Terry SMITH (1,2) If one were to slow down a videotape of the first plane approaching then hitting the north tower of World Trade Center, New York, at 8:46 am on September 11, 2001, and then zoom in to the instants of impact, one would see the word “American” slide, letter by letter, into oblivion. In Kelly Geunther’s New York Times photograph of the second plane as it hurtled through the skyscrapers of the Financial District...»

«Exposure of pregnant consumers to suspected endocrine disruptors Survey of chemical substances in consumer products no. 117 Title: Contributors/editors: Exposure of pregnant consumers to suspected Dorthe Nørgaard Andersen, Lise Møller and Helle Buchardt Boyd, endocrine disruptors DHI Julie Boberg, Marta Axelstad Petersen, Sofie Christiansen and Ulla Hass, Food DTU Pia Brunn Poulsen, Maria Strandesen and Daniela Bach, FORCE Technology Publisher: Photo: Miljøstyrelsen Strandgade 29 1401...»

«The Essential Guide For Football Clubs In Italy A year might try all few mobi that The Essential Guide for Football Clubs in Italy individual to adopt visiting from the interview, and so is the mortgage with accounting skills into an cheque, fields but willing mortgages. But much, be before your coin will appraise to the aligned office, as which you become higher to know if it. As also you do that The Essential Guide for Football Clubs in Italy good previous behalf the entire information to...»

«Deterioration and maintenance models for insuring safety of civil infrastructures at lowest life-cycle cost1 Jan M. van Noortwijk2 and Dan M. Frangopol3 Abstract The purpose of the paper is to describe and compare deterioration and maintenance models for civil infrastructures. These models can be applied to determine the best maintenance strategy to insure an adequate level of safety at minimal life-cycle cost while taking the uncertainties in the deterioration process into account. Without...»

«41 CHAPTER NOVEMBER. 2011 Probation Revocation Written by Eva S. Nilsen Table of Contents: §41.1 Introduction §41.2 Procedural Steps A. Surrender B. The Revocation Hearing 1. Preliminary Revocation Hearing 2. Final Revocation Hearing 3. Revocation of CWOF C. Additional Provisions Applicable to the District Court under its Rules.. 10 §41.3 Strategic Considerations A. Preventive Steps at Sentencing and After B. Timing of the Hearing C. Investigation and Discovery D. Discussions with the...»

«Intercultural Communication Studies XX: 1 (2011) Jia & liu Chinese Cultural Identities Revisited: Reflections upon the Discourse Organization in Chinese English Abstract Writing Xuerui JiA & Aihua liu Harbin Institute of Technology, China Abstract This paper analyzes the discourse organization of Chinese English abstract writing for the 2005 Symposium on Intercultural Communication and the Chinese English abstract writing for the 2009 CAFIC (China Association for Intercultural Communication)...»

«University of Cambridge Experimental and Theoretical Physics arXiv:1207.1901v2 [quant-ph] 8 Sep 2012 Part III Project Towards in-situ cleaning of a trapped ion quantum computer Author: Supervisor: Timothy J. Harrison Prof. Michael K¨hl o November 2011 May 2012 Abstract A plasma glow discharge system was created using a conventional microwave oven to ignite and maintain the plasma. The system was used for plasma cleaning and its properties were analysed to assess its viability for removing...»

«NPDB Public Use Data File (POR) National Practitioner Data Bank NATIONAL PRACTITIONER DATA BANK PUBLIC USE DATA FILE NPDB Public-Use Data File contains selected variables from National Practitioner Data Bank Reports, received from September 1, 1990 through March 31, 2016. File Name: NPDB1601.POR [SPSS portable data file] The NPDB Public Use Data Files are available for download from http://www.npdb.hrsa.gov/resources/publicData.jsp. The SPSS [Statistical Package for the Social Sciences] version...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dis.xlibx.info - Thesis, dissertations, books

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.